The debate "Love at first sight = lust" was started by
February 29, 2016, 9:44 am.
27 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 25 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
R_o_h_i_t posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
PsychDave posted 1 argument, NaggingNut posted 1 argument, JakobBoghora posted 2 arguments, neveralone posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
R_o_h_i_t, barman, RyanWakefield, ReadyToBegin, zariva129, ProudAmerican888, sickboyblonde, jen, Gaurangi, neveralone, jack_tim_45, wdz, allyssa and 14 visitors agree.
PsychDave, vermouth, NaggingNut, xaveragexjoesx, carlos1ja, JakobBoghora, SwaggerPoptart, s_hatefi, Hijumi, razzy00, harshita, Rajat and 13 visitors disagree.
@jakob saying that it's stupid is not true. and ur evidence does not support such a claim.
love at first sight is not lust.
Love at first sight is just stupid. You dont know anything about the person anf therefore you cant love them.
Lust is to live out your sex fantasies. That sometimes include blindfold which is no sight.
Love at first sight = marksman
Hate at first sight =hate only
It is true we tend to be attracted to someone based on how our brain perceives the symmetry of their faces. Regardless of whether it's lust or just being drawn to a person.
Depending on the hormonal levels of an individual , and level or type of attractiveness (is he/she Hot or Cute or Charismatic) it varies from lust to just plain old admiring.
So I disagree, love at first sight doesn't always have to be lust. You can be drawn to someone for various reasons.
Anyone got any arguments for the statement? I was curious to see what people thought. I'm neutral, by the way.
That's not true. My live at first sight was my best friend and I have no lust for her. I have a hard time lusting for a stranger so easily and my boyfriend I thought he was the one the first time I saw him. I wasn't thinking about sexual advances and we didn't kiss for like two months and I had no interest to until a month later.
Anyone got any arguments for the statement? I was curious to see what people thought.
It would be never a lust since love at first sight involves only a slight "attraction" or even an "admiration". It's like when you went inside the mall and saw a bag with wonderful colors which have gotten your attention
Love at first sight is interest. It is not necessarily lust. It could just be a desire to get to know someone based on context (like what they are doing).