The debate "Mahabharata and ramayana are real" was started by
Ateet on
July 13, 2018, 1:26 am.
35 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 14 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
SaffronSHAM3 posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
Ateet, gargi, luljeta101 and 32 visitors agree.
SaffronSHAM3 and 13 visitors disagree.
Ramayana and mahabharata are legends so we can never know for sure if they were true for not. But based on their storyline Ramayana seems to have too many unrealistic events, e.g. Animals conversating with humans, demons flying in and out of countries in minutes,demons having ten heads, deers having golden skin and many more of such fabled stuff. This aroused my suspicion on the authenticity and the reality
of the events that occured in Ramayana and therefore i believe that Ramayana is a work of fiction.
Mahabharata on the other is mich more believable to an extent and is also like much of the Indian soap operas nowadays. Therefore i feel that mahabharata, though not as engrossing
as the Ramayana, is much more authentic and realistic than Ramayana
They are fake cause i have heard from Indians that they depict use of 'nuclear weapons'. Tf
they are absolutely real. the bible is real too, ive seen it many times.
I think the question is, why do you think they are true?