The debate "Mass shooters prove they are civilian enemies+police allies by never shooting at police stations." was started by
November 8, 2017, 12:13 pm.
4 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 3 people are on the disagree side.
There needs to be more votes to see what the common perception is.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
Najam1 posted 4 arguments to the agreers part.
neveralone posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
Najam1, YoungVoicesof_Tomorrow and 2 visitors agree.
neveralone and 2 visitors disagree.
your first two sentences were ok. then u went downhill. I don't praise the police. I do respect the job since they try to protect me from murderer, robbers, mass shooters and have died doing so. I am completely fine with anyone defending themselves from someone trying to kill them. no one is forced to be police.
You misunderstand my understanding of police. I am aware that it's only one of many potential jobs a human can be hired as.
Murderers, robbers, mass shooters, and people such as yourself think the job bestow godhood on a person.
Hence, you think it's acceptable for one of them to return fire against someone attempting to kill them, but it's not okay for a human who doesn't have a job as a police.
People shouldn't be forced to work as police, or have a written or verbal contract with one who has a job as police in order to be safe from robbery, extortion, or murder.
But you don't understand.
I understand. I knew that when u said it since the first def. u provided doesn't make since in that sentence. would u not agree?
u have an unfounded conspiracy against police. it isn't how u think it is so u cant really participate in such a conspiracy. when I was talking about conspiracies I was meaning most of ur unfounded accusations towards police. u obviously don't like them and u say a lot against them but never back it up.
I was calling you the second definition.
How do you accuse me of participating in the conspiracy and discrimination against people who don't have jobs as police?
Your robbers and killers are the ones who are producing the deadly results amongst the masses of society who don't spend the majority of their lives in police cars or stations.
so basically this is one of your conspiracies against the police and not and actual argument? I see you haven't changed.
by the way, I know exactly what a blunderbuss is. pirates had a particular interest even though it was a very unreliable gun that could blow up on u but could shoot anything.
a short-barreled large-bored gun with a flared muzzle, used at short range.
an action or way of doing something regarded as lacking in subtlety and precision.
You Forking blunderbuss!
Why shoot a person who refuses to work as police either?
They have the audacity to wield a gun without asking any police first, yet the only people they are willing to rob, murder, or shoot aren't even the people who did go ask police if it's okay to shoot back at robbers and killers.
why shoot the police? their definitely armed, skilled, and wouldn't make as much news as public places. if it's for terrorist reasons, then they will definitely go for public places because people will be less likely to go out if places they would go to are getting shot up or blown up