The debate "Maybe the shooter would have dropped the gun if Donald Trump ran up on him" was started by
February 27, 2018, 2:55 pm.
6 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 12 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
Najam1 posted 11 arguments to the agreers part.
historybuff posted 5 arguments to the disagreers part.
Najam1, Nemiroff, Willyis and 3 visitors agree.
historybuff, NPW and 10 visitors disagree.
if those laws worked, homosexual sodomite rapists wouldn't be afraid to only beat and rape weak men where there are no guns. They are afraid of gunshots, not crumpling paper.
that's why we instituted laws to protect people and a constitution to constrain government power. we need laws, not guns.
The gun control demons are responsible for many atrocities against the weakest of men. Predators attack on both sides of the prison wall.
Sadists enjoyed throwing unarmed Christians to lions according to history.
that article has nothing to do with modern gun control. America was very racist historically. so literally any topic has a racist history. using that as an argument to prevent progress today is dumb.
Well, it's better to have a president that realizes slavery and indentured servant rules of USA still permeate. Based on the color of your skin, you were given a free gun or denied one. In modern day, the false god police just attack a person of color and stick them with a felony to deny them a gun, or call them crazy to deny them a gun. I don't think Donald Trump is playing that game of allowing certain people of America to have guns and forcing certain people of America to be shot while unarmed.
I read the article. witnesses disagree if trump had anything to do with it. one of them said trump showed up after the guy ran off.
What about when he hopped out the car and ran up on a mugger?
I don't think he was kidding. I don't even think he was lying. I think he believes it. he is also delusional. he has never done anything to back up what he is saying. but that is true of the majority of what he says.
He called a guy a coward in front of a national audience. Do you think he was kidding about running in and saving defenseless children being shot while one is right there, right outside with a badge&gun?
He might be the first modern world leader to defeat the color game. His statement means he sees children being educated as children regardless of their ethnicity. Racists don't make claims of heroism.
he could be the 1st president to claim he's super man. that doesn't mean we should believe him. he has never done anything in his life, that I am aware of, that would lead me to believe he would actually do that.
He is the first president to claim that he would run up on an armed gunman while carrying no weapon himself, in an attempt to rescue children that aren't even his.
You have to at least count the thought, regardless if he himself is actually incapable of running.
the point was that he is a cowardly opportunist. no part of his personal history suggests he would put his life at stake to protect others.
okay, there's at least one civilian within USA, that would have engaged the shooter armed with only a slingshot, just for the sake of the children.
How do you guys compare refusing to go invade foreign land and killing those opposing such an invasion; versus defending the children within your own homeland, children disarmed and practically defenseless while following your own orders of education and supposed claims of protection?
Donald Trump & company aren't telling foreign entities they can't have guns because USA police are willing to come shoot any bad guy that attacks. The children of US are the ones under the impression that Trump or some guards, or some cops will come running in the event of an attack.
considering trump is a draft dodger, does anyone believe that he is willing to put himself in danger to help others?