The debate "Minors should be able to obtain abortions without parental consent" was started by
January 9, 2014, 6:26 am.
17 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 26 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
echofrommadiun posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
MotleyRose1 posted 1 argument, Michelle_M posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
theRighteousBro, BespokeJokeBloke, echofrommadiun, true_debate_life, kennediharris515, Vivinary, strawberryfieldsforever, Mikey2k and 9 visitors agree.
wmd, MotleyRose1, Ormazul, LukasiakHyland1, tkershaw3, hipsterkiwi, Michelle_M, Curious_Student, DeWthaDeW, Jake, Bodaciouslady16, sdiop, Mathew, SwaggerPoptart and 12 visitors disagree.
Women should be realize if they aren’t mature enough, so it’s too immature to have a baby. The proposition today believes that limiting the right to have an abortion of teenage girls in any way has dire consequences for the women, for the potential children and for the society as a whole. Therefore even parents should not be able to limit the right of their daughters to have an abortion.
Minors should be supervised so they cannot engage in sexual relations. If a parent knows that their offspring will defy them and have sex, they should get their daughters on birth control and keep their sons supplied with condoms. Both are free at health departments so there is no excuse for not obtaining them. If these safeguards fail and a minor becomes pregnant then the infant should be given to those who cannot conceive for adoption.
1, abortion can be deadly to a minor. 2, A minor would never understand the long term effect taking another human life would have on them until it was too late.