The debate "My debate opponents have a solution for those in despair and hopelessness due to poverty" was started by
an anonymous person on
March 15, 2018, 1:35 pm.
5 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 5 people are on the disagree side.
There is a tie in this debate, post your arguments, call some reinforcements and break this tie.
Najam1 posted 12 arguments to the agreers part.
Nemiroff and 4 visitors agree.
5 visitors disagree.
You are a lying fool who openly declares you only want me under authority of your ungodly allies.
You never want to see me with my children because you're an evil lying, hating bastard who has to hide because you never want me to see you alive with your children either.
You better hide, stupid pathetic fool.
you are the only one declaring what I supposedly want. That sounds insane. and now you are the one speaking of my death.
goodbye. I won't be responding to you anymore.
Well, if I do read about you being found dead, I would have no way of verifying that it's actually you.
If you check yourself into an insane asylum, then at least you will win your goal of making sure nobody sees you alive in the company of happy wives and healthy biological children.
The fate you want for me is so bad and so awful, that everytime I am with my wives and children; I smile at all wretched jealous men and wonder which one of them is you.
You are a liar and a fool who wants me with no wives, no children, and no money.
Or else you want to see me dead.
You want to force me to have your life, where I would have to hide myself from strangers and nobody ever sees me with a wife or my own children.
Obviously, I won't get to read about you being found dead because you are an expert at hiding your identify and lying about it online.
and in response you throw the gravest of insults at me
name 1 person who understood what you are trying to say and didn't say something along the lines of:
"what are you talking about?"
I'm not trying to insult you, I am trying to get you to seek medical help.
You use fake multiple identities to attack when I tell the truth about things you dislike.
There are many previous posts here I made that provided great discussion.
Not every post I make is a hit, but at least I don't need to lie in order to stimulate minds.
it is hard to say who is the crazy lying one objectively. no one has ever made a conclusive definition for sanity, insanity is just a lack of that thing we can't describe.
however, I can say that your posts make no sense. and I'm not the only one to say this. can you name one person here who has understood you?
goodbye najam. good luck.
Nemiroff is attacking me to distract from the topic, please excuse me for putting that lying, jealous, ungodly psychotic fool in his place.
He really, really hates when I post a truthful debate subject in which he is one of the guilty people referred to.
You are clearly a raving, hating, jealous, psycho-lunatic fool who needs Islam and prayer.
A jealous fool such as yourself hates me from the core of your soul because you are a liar who is absolutely determined to go to hell after you die.
You are a lying fool who absolutely has every intention of making sure you are never seen alive in the company of your own biological children.
You are a hating, lying fool who will hide from me until the day you go to the grave because of how much you hate me being in the presence of my own biological children.
Everytime I post something truthful that you hate you attack me like the lying, hiding, cowardly, living fuel for hell that you truly are.
I defend his right to state the truth and to tell a person with clear mental illness to seek medical help.
the number one spot means you post the most... and you post the most nonsensical rants. congradulations you win.
anyone can make #1 by repeatedly making useless posts like a broken record.
See, I got the number one spot because I don't attack people for writing what they feel like writing. I only attack the point of view.
There is a famous saying that goes: "I may not like what you say, but I will defend your right to say it"
Your motto is to claim that one who says what you don't agree with is crazy.
That works well for you as a distraction, but does nothing to alter the mindstate of the one presenting what you find controversial.
You would be much more effective and beautiful in countering these ideas which provoke so much antipathy within you without attacking the one making such pronouncements.
I have learned a lot from everyone on the internet, even from those here with the least intelligence, if only you noticed.
I present something truthful. You get angry because it's true and you can't do anything about it. You then start attacking me directly and calling me insane because you are angry I am taking offensive against what you wish to hide and protect.
You are not winning by deflecting from the topic to attack me and attempt to disintegrate the discussion into:
"No, you're crazy"
"You need white coats"
"You need to pray on both knees"
I'll get my brother on you"
"I have a bigger brother to go get against you and your brother"
you have no debate opponents because all you do is go on deranged, insane rants. it is impossible to debate with you.
Even if the man is millions in debt, the correct options aren't presented to him.
There are literally men driven to suicide by the current stratagem. In addition to having inadequate funds to provide necessities for his family, he is informed that funding is actually available from the government, but only to his detriment. Poverty is the greatest weapon in the arsenal of those connected with taxation and creating money, but who sees it?
Using state or federal funds for confinement in a mental institution is always the first suggestion.
If a man is poor and has a wife, incite a divorce.
If a man is poor, take his children and give money from the state funds to another individual to care for them.
Only use state funds to make his situation worse, so he will have no wives, no children and even more poverty.
Some women in poverty are exempt from this persecution and granted a government funded living arrangement predicated on agreement that the biological father is alienated so they can assume his parenting role.