Newspapers are no longer valuable

August 18, 2016, 2:17 pm

Agree8 Disagree9

47%
53%

The debate "Newspapers are no longer valuable" was started by hunadi on August 18, 2016, 2:17 pm. 8 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 9 people are on the disagree side. People are starting to choose their side. It looks like most people are against to this statement.

dalton7532 posted 2 arguments to the agreers part.
PsychDave posted 2 arguments to the disagreers part.

hunadi, dalton7532, thereal, ElvisKim_22 and 4 visitors agree.
Najam1, PsychDave, SwaggerPoptart, HarveyLightfoot and 5 visitors disagree.

PsychDave
replied to...

You said they are valuable and voted that they are not.

3 years, 2 months ago

my Grandfather is reading a newspaper now. he likes it cause he can pick what stories to read instead of watching the news where they pick, and he can avoid technology and Web browsing that is difficult and confusing to him.

3 years, 2 months ago

I said they are of great value, and the NYT is more influential on the web.

3 years, 2 months ago

If you watch the news, many stories start with "as reported in the New York Times" or something similar. Newspapers tend to break the story and television picks it up.

3 years, 2 months ago

They are of great value, especially in smaller cities. Most old folks get their news and what is going on in their community from newspapers.

3 years, 2 months ago
Discuss "Newspapers are no longer valuable " news
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.