The debate "No one should own anything. Everything should belong to everyone. The world is all of ours" was started by
February 8, 2015, 11:51 pm.
11 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 28 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
I_Voyager posted 2 arguments, phattie83 posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
giveuspeacedamnitt, AmFoRealsies, LauroDalton, Vivinary, Mr_Anonymous, LeaderOfDiscussion, l_ramos and 4 visitors agree.
I_Voyager, phattie83, debater377, DavidStuff777, wmd, mdavis1309, Gordonchm, darlingelysian, Jungleheart, river93x, liamjosephcash, Hjkp98, BloodyCarousel, shinywhale, resiliently and 13 visitors disagree.
I was trying to point out the arguments flaws sarcastically. We need property rights so people can control their own deatinies. We all own the world, but in divided pieces. I agree this means there should be home and resource for everyone, but my home and resource is not yours unless I share or sell it.
That's a terrible argument Voyager...
The debate question is poorly asked, it combines three elements in one, and the first two contradict each other! How can no one own anything AND own everything? And the world IS all of ours, but that has nothing to do with individual items and possessions...
That's right. I walked into your/my kitchen and ate your/my food. When you tried to do the same to my/your house, shooting you was not an act of murder. Since your life was also my life, it was suicide.