Non-violent crimes shouldn't result in jail time because it costs too much and they aren't a threat

January 2, 2014, 2:03 pm

Agree7 Disagree7

50%
50%

The debate "Non-violent crimes shouldn't result in jail time because it costs too much and they aren't a threat" was started by srm22 on January 2, 2014, 2:03 pm. 7 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 7 people are on the disagree side. People are starting to choose their side. There is a tie in this debate, post your arguments, call some reinforcements and break this tie.

tkershaw3 posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
posted the first argument on this debate as an agreeing part.

srm22, untouchableshe, tkershaw3 and 4 visitors agree.
juliaccollazo and 6 visitors disagree.

I generally agree, but I think large-scale financial crimes should come with a prison sentence. Bankrupting people is possibly more painful and damaging than beating them up or something like that.

5 years, 10 months ago
Discuss "Non-violent crimes shouldn't result in jail time because it costs too much and they aren't a threat" society politics
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.