The debate "Only a complete coward is willing to advocate bans on any American from returning fire if fired upon" was started by
February 26, 2018, 12:09 am.
7 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 2 people are on the disagree side.
There needs to be more votes to see what the common perception is.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
Najam1 posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
Najam1, Aiyana, NPW, wallingson13, chemikilsm0ke and 2 visitors agree.
Yiyi and 1 visitor disagree.
That's the main problem. You are only advocating for those who kill with bare hands. All who are elite with killing with bare hands are biased. They shouldn't have come to Earth after guns were invented. Every fight can result in death. Those who kill with bare hands are notorious for pretending that any and all bare-handed fights never resulted in anyone's death. The Hell-bound person who hasn't died yet is the main cheerleader of those who are afraid to fight with guns, but not afraid to kill with bare hands. If a good shooter has to fight against a bare-handed killer, he only has to offer the bare-handed killer a gun to fight with. He does not have to drop his gun just because his opponent can only kill with bare hands and afraid of the loud bang from a gun. A fight to the death never comes with the rule that it must be done by only bare-handed opponents. Unless you are grappling your own biological children, every fight against a stranger can potentially end with the death of either combatant. Nobody is going to tell me that bare-handed killers are the only ones who get to choose what weapon is allowed in defense of one's own life.
I would advocate for a system where neither of them would be carrying guns. the entire situation would therefore be avoided. why would you want a system where you will be fired upon?