Parent should be required to vaccinate their children unless they have a valid medical reason not to

February 22, 2017, 4:03 pm

Agree12 Disagree6

67%
33%

The debate "Parent should be required to vaccinate their children unless they have a valid medical reason not to" was started by historybuff on February 22, 2017, 4:03 pm. 12 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 6 people are on the disagree side. People are starting to choose their side. It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.

historybuff posted 2 arguments to the agreers part.
Ematio posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.

historybuff, PsychDave, redstar and 9 visitors agree.
Ematio, UnderdogMike and 4 visitors disagree.

Requiring someone to get vaccinated is a breach of our freedom as Americans and Human beings

2 years, 3 months ago
neveralone
replied to...

true.

2 years, 3 months ago
Nemiroff
replied to...

the only people who have a religious exemption are the ones who refuse all medicine and try to pray away their cancer. they have a legitimate, real objection.

some people believe that "the body is a temple" and modifications such as tattoos and piercings are sacrilege, but medicine is internal, like food. and vaccines are no different that any other medicine.

so unless the person has a known history of viewing medicine in general as sacrilege, then their antivaxx view is hysteria, not religious freedom.

2 years, 3 months ago
neveralone
replied to...

well it goes agaisnt our right of religion. though I believe u should get vaccination some even if twisted based this off their religion so we can't touch it. this is when it gets muddy of course and there is no clear answer except trying to convince them that it isn't agaisnt their beleif.but I say good luck to the one that tries.

2 years, 3 months ago

I would say in terms of government benefits, definitely. On the other hand, requiring a patient to do something is somewhat difficult considering you want patients to trust their doctors. Yeah, the anti Vax are few and in between, but rolling out anything required will put strain on everyone's trust.

I've mentioned my situation on a particular vaccine, and how I was harmed, but it was an abysmal chance, less than a fraction and definitely unpredictable. Hell, it's more likely to die from the bigger, badder versions of the stuff meant to immunize.

2 years, 3 months ago

personally I would argue that parents should not be allowed to risk the lives of their children, and other people's children, based on vague religious objections. there are no religions, to my knowledge, that specify anything about vaccination. some choose to twist their religion and interpret it that way.

as a society I think we should value the life of a child over the beliefs of their parents.

but I accept that this is a much more difficult thing to argue with people that are afraid of having their religious rights attacked.

2 years, 3 months ago
neveralone
replied to...

some religions are agaisnt it though so in the case of religion I disagree.

2 years, 3 months ago

Vaccines have been proven over and over again to be safe and very effective at preventing potentially fatal deseases.

unless there is a valid medical reason not to, parents should be required to do what is best for their child. which is clearly to vaccinate them.

2 years, 3 months ago
Discuss "Parent should be required to vaccinate their children unless they have a valid medical reason not to" politics science society
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.