People who don't identify by the biologically assigned sex should be frowned upon

May 26, 2017, 11:19 pm

Agree6 Disagree9

40%
60%

The debate "People who don't identify by the biologically assigned sex should be frowned upon" was started by The13yearoldconservative on May 26, 2017, 11:19 pm. 6 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 9 people are on the disagree side. People are starting to choose their side. It looks like most people are against to this statement.

thereal posted 2 arguments to the agreers part.
Christian posted 1 argument, M3phisto posted 2 arguments to the disagreers part.

The13yearoldconservative, thereal, Marlize, SirIntegra and 2 visitors agree.
M3phisto, Christian, RedstarIsWeird, fishermo20, bernie2020 and 4 visitors disagree.

Listen here kid. Intersex is used now because civilised societies evolve. Hermaphrodite is used for animals right now.

Intersex are variable, but many of them don't have a fecond organ so it is not 'working'. They don't fit in any category because, you may be surprised but being a male doesn't involve just having a penis.. It's a whole organism (hormones, fecondity, physiolocal changes and even in the bone structure)

The sex male and female are a set of defined standards by the conservative members of society. There are people who don't fit in those categories and others who don't identify to them. Even if in all biological aspects a person is a male, they can freely identify as a female. It is their right to do whatever the f*** they want. Who are you to state that if you don't stick to a conventional sex, you would be mentally ill??

2 years, 2 months ago

M3phisto, "intersex" and hermaphrodite are the same thing you retard except snowflakes like you found "hermaphrodite" to be offensive so they started calling them "intersex" (which is very misleading as a title).

"Intersex people were previously referred to as hermaphrodites" (wikipedia). So yeah, your "brief" searches are the reason you normally dont know much more than the basic details of a topic that is being debated.

Regarding the recognition of hermaphrodites, i never said they didnt exist so whats your point? you stated that it is recognised by some states but i never even said that they dont exist, rather i said it is a genetic disorder (which it is). The fact that you decided to utilise a strawman argument because you cant disprove basic scientific facts shows how pathetic and dry you are as a living entity. pity.

2 years, 2 months ago
M3phisto
replied to...

After a brief search, the exact term is 'intersexual' or third sex. It is recognised by different societies like in Japan or India.

Thereal will you one day evolve from that primitive mind of yours?

2 years, 2 months ago

m3phisto is a complete retard like his goatf***ing forefathers and doesnt know how anything works. your biological sex is the only one that matters and if someone "identifies" as being something other than their biological sex, theyre mentally ill and need to be institutionalised so that they cant come in contact with and indoctrinate any children into tgeir perverse beliefs. and no, having a "sex" change doesnt change your biological sex at all because their chromosomes are still either xx or xy. regarding hermaphrodites, that is not a sex you complete imbecile, it is a genetic disorder. Not only that, but they still do fit into only one of the sex categories (male or female) because only one of their genitals actually works whereas the other is purely aesthetic. For example a hermaohrodite who is male is one whose penis works but the vagina doesnt and vice versa. indeed m3phisto doesnt understand shit and should be kept safely away from the population.

2 years, 2 months ago

Im a Christian and even though I don't approve of their actions, they are still equal to us

2 years, 2 months ago
M3phisto
replied to...

PS: You can identify to what you want, but that is your PS, you are free to modify it. But that is not the case with your BS.

2 years, 2 months ago

There is a difference between your biological and psychological sex. Lets name them BS and PS. You are free to choose your own PS, but you are born with one of the three BS(male, female or hermaphrodite) that you can't choose from. You can't 'identify' as another sex because biologically you are only one sex. You can then alter your BS to make it match with your PS. But then your BS will still be one sex that has been altered. That's it. You can choose to identify to whatever u want but when you are born a man and then get operations to become a woman.. you are a BS altered man. You can't ever fully biologically be a woman. Not by today's science progresses anyways.

But no, we shouldnt frown against these people because you can identify to whatever you want for as long as it doesn't hurt anyone. What happens in your mind is your only concern. People who do frown against those can't understand that and don't respect basic freedoms: the freedom of thought and belief.

2 years, 2 months ago

Why? It doesn't hurt me or anyone else, so why would it be a problem?

2 years, 2 months ago
Discuss "People who don't identify by the biologically assigned sex should be frowned upon" religion science society
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.