The debate "Pets are substitute for children" was started by
February 7, 2014, 3:41 pm.
15 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 6 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
tkershaw3 posted 1 argument, Michelle_M posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
BespokeJokeBloke, tkershaw3, Michelle_M, suchadahl, Psych_Code and 10 visitors agree.
londonlightz and 5 visitors disagree.
Pets can be a substitute for people who either cannot have children or have grown children who've moved out. Animals are a good source of companionship for lonely individuals. However, they should be treated like animals and not like kids.
Maybe, but not a good one. And those who make their pets out to be their kids are just strange.