The debate "Plastic surgery for purely cosmetic reasons and values should be banned" was started by
March 31, 2016, 5:41 pm.
5 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 3 people are on the disagree side.
There needs to be more votes to see what the common perception is.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
PsychDave posted 2 arguments to the disagreers part.
supercat, ProudAmerican888, Maximus, sophie15forest and 1 visitor agree.
PsychDave and 2 visitors disagree.
Ok one more.. "L.A. face with an Oakland Booty"
but you gotta always remember.. "never trust a big butt and a smile" LOL
A butt man is a man who appreciates when a girl walk in with a itty bitty waist and a round thing in your face.
a female with a nice behind. ; )
"I like big butts and I can not lie" -Sir Mixalot
what is a butt man?
To add a little levety, I know one thing that should be banned. Being a butt man myself, I think those spanx with the added buttcheek pads(to make butts look bigger than they actually are) should be banned immediately. That is very much a false advertisement. ; )
Should this ban include ear piercing and tattoos? What constitutes purely cosmetic reasons? Reconstructive surgery of burn victims can be cosmetic to try to fix scarring. It is not medically necessary, but it does improve quality of life.
I am just looking for where you draw the line. You obviously understand that there are valid reasons, but I'm curious where you stop seeing the surgery as justified.
why? if someone has the money to spend on a cosmetic procedure why would you care?