The debate "Police are unnecessary because they aren't reducing crime" was started by
January 2, 2019, 7:59 pm.
12 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 29 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
JDAWG9693 posted 4 arguments, Alexandra posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
Vvvvvvv, ranwarrior, mondelay and 9 visitors agree.
Nemiroff, JDAWG9693, Nanjinga_90, WiseWords, Alexandra, MrShine, MatthewTurner03, politicsislife, goodlo, TJefferson, Shoto, Debate_Master1011 and 17 visitors disagree.
There are bad teachers, as well. Should we just get rid of the schools?
Just because there are a few bad parts of the whole, does not mean that the whole is useless.
While the bad police officers are unarguably bad for any society, those make up so few of the total of officers, being a strawman of an argument for officers as a whole.
I agree with him. But on my side... first, kindly please SPECIFY ALL OF YOUR QUESTIONS BECAUSE IT IS ALL COMPLETELY FLAWED! Second, to correct your statement... Absurd/Lazy/Savage/etc. police are the ones that are NOT NECESSARY because THEY are the ones who are not reducing "crimes". Policemen are needed all-over the world to enforce (strictly) the laws to make sure that peace and order maintains in the country.
I could ask 100 people why they don't commit crime and I'm willing to bet that at least 75 of them will say because they do not want to go to jail.
What statistics do you have to support this claim??