The debate "Same sex schools are better for education" was started by
August 30, 2015, 10:06 am.
By the way, Spring is disagreeing with this statement.
17 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 60 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
sloanstar1000 posted 1 argument, ganeshbhat posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
Sooraj, sabrina, shobhit, djuanstewart, keshav_garg, Katerina and 11 visitors agree.
Spring, sloanstar1000, DanielleR123, BennieBenston, Klowrig22, gouthamabi, PsychDave, Bluevelvet, eaqyyy, Maharshi, carrot, Bodaciouslady16, AstroSpace, ganeshbhat, ReedSchneider, Bestforevr, Sumerian, Yuki_Amayane, sidhant, dotdotdot, Neaa, Ryan, Hellrazor, Katana_MC, Band_Nerd_24, AlenaMaisel and 34 visitors disagree.
Dear amigo, God didn't manifest anything devoid of a sweet and meaningful partner. Rain-sunshine, day -night, merry - sorrow to name a few . I my opinion unless a strong and inevitable scenario arises, it is nothing lesser than a bullshit to plan for a single sex school . If your objective is to abstain the attraction shit in the learning stage and help students concentrate better on their academics, you should hear me freaking out "IT DOESN'T SERVE THAT PURPOSE". (Exceptions are not examples) I dunno.. but it may hinder one's emotional development and thereby damage one's personality. Don't you think it is denying one's right? Some may feel it's hectic or as if they were imprisoned. If a boy and a girl study together, it helps them to know the opposite gender better. They learn to socialise with contemporary people, maintain a healthy relationship, a healthy attitude, and some respect on one another. Ultimately the aim of education is to equip the subjects with skills necessary for an exemplary life. Coed school serve this purpose irrefutably. UNLESS THE CONSENT OF THE SUBJECT, HE/SHE SHOULDN'T BE PUSHED TO SINGLE SEX SCHOOLS