Science goes directly against a literal translation of the Abrahamic holy books

September 9, 2017, 9:19 pm

Agree6 Disagree15


The debate "Science goes directly against a literal translation of the Abrahamic holy books" was started by Diogenes_of_Sinope on September 9, 2017, 9:19 pm. 6 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 15 people are on the disagree side. People are starting to choose their side. It looks like most people are against to this statement.

Diogenes_of_Sinope posted 4 arguments, locke posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
locke posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.

Diogenes_of_Sinope and 5 visitors agree.
officiallsse, sabrina, locke and 12 visitors disagree.

replied to...

then you kinda agreed what I'm saying. I'm saying it goes in direct opposition to what the stories literally say. case in point. my sister believes the world is 6000 years old, God poofed us on here, and there was a worldwide flood. science goes against all that

18 hours, 53 minutes ago

I won't say it like.. it's opposition to it... but.. see science is only based up on the observations... scientists look for something different.. like say it for newton.. bcz everyone know his story.. right.??. anyways... when the gravitational law was not introduced... newton saw a pattern .. which is if any thing goes up ... it'll come down definitely.. he worked on this observation and gave a law... and first of all do you know what is a law.? in science, law is something that is repeating by doing some action.. universe follows a pattern and science is the way to uncover it.. and about holy books... as far as i know they're just stories... there are no proofs... if there are, then i don't know about them.. let me know if there are some.. and there are some phonomenas that even science can't explain but we've just scratched the surface of science... there was a scientist, i don't know his name but he once said that if science is the whole ocean then we just know as much as a drop of water in it...

6 days, 16 hours ago
replied to...

eg. evolution vs creation, the idea of a world wide flood, the book of job

1 week, 1 day ago

how does science go directly against the holy books

1 week, 1 day ago
replied to...

Bible, quran, torrah, hadethes, etc.

1 week, 1 day ago

now with "holy books" are we talking about?

1 week, 2 days ago

I'm not saying the holy books are wrong. I'm saying science is in direct opposition to a literal interpretation of the holy books

1 week, 3 days ago

So the holy books are wrong, considering science is based proof backed facts.

1 week, 4 days ago
Discuss "Science goes directly against a literal translation of the Abrahamic holy books" religion
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.