The debate "Science is not man made. Theories scientific are man made." was started by
January 10, 2019, 1:07 pm.
42 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 16 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
Shoto posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
JDAWG9693 posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
goodlo, DollarStoreDildo, dhillman1280, TJefferson, shahriaralzubayer1, dazzasanta420, Shoto, Debate_Master1011, Argument_fightme, Dmoderate32, mzidanr and 31 visitors agree.
JDAWG9693, HelloWorLd and 14 visitors disagree.
There are too many things which were not "born" in the earth, they made by human.But everything needs some theories, for example there was idea to create car, to create mobile phone and so on, What is idea?- it is something which should call science
agreed, but aspects of it are not "natural". For example experimenting to create bronze was science, but bronze is not a natural element. It only comes into existence by the intervention of humans.
"Science" is simply the observation or experimentation of the world. Dogs do "science" by seeing when the cat will scratch at it if he keeps pawing at it.
Scientific theories are simply us explaining observations. So, the wording is man made, I suppose, but the fact of the theory itself is not. For example, the theory of gravity was written by man, but gravity would exist regardless.