The debate "Selfies exist because of women who are too cheap to hire a photographer" was started by
December 19, 2017, 12:36 pm.
5 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 32 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
Najam1 posted 7 arguments to the agreers part.
blue_rayy posted 4 arguments, Nemiroff posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
Najam1, trump and 3 visitors agree.
Axos, Nemiroff, blue_rayy, Niel, subhasmita, Berry_Good, Against_eu, anu1302, viralbeats, BrynnY, kissmyashleeyy, kidkck, Moonlight, ConyGoalard and 18 visitors disagree.
It's quite obvious they were referencing a man. If one believes that a photograph with girlfriends is worthy of being taken in a toilet than the photographer is worthy of being a female educated in the art of light and shadow to further emphasize the fact that the friends want to show off in such an environment.
where did he mention that photographers are male? do you even understand the words others write?
Next you will be singing praises about a self inflicting tattoo device to stiff those who tattoo humans flesh out of their money. #Machinesarenotartists
Who are you to declare that all photographers are limited to being male, and a pervert at that?
Just admit that some women are too cheap to pony up on the dough and pay a professional, whether it's a man or a woman.
Photography is not the simple act of point and shoot with a sophisticated device.
You guys have the picture game as backwards as those paparazzi who chased Princess Diana to her death.
Why would a girl want to hire a photographer to take a picture of her and her gfs in the restroom? Selfies are taken because only you know exactly what u want to look like in the photo. It's faster to snap a photo yourself. So many reasons, really.
I am not the madman. You are the underprivileged, undereducated man.
Princess Di, wasn't killed while posing for a selfie.
Don't insult me just because you aren't old enough to have witnessed her saga take place all over the television sets.
I watched them bring in the selfie fad to replace actual photographers, but those who adopted it on a massive scale aren't even worth the time of even a single paparazzi.
selfies we're done long before the camera was invented. they were called self portraits back then
i still didnt get it why you are against girl selfies. I am not going to judge your photographic capabilities BUT you are a madman from middle of nowhere cause you make connections with selfies, porn, photographers and even princess Diana in your comment! wow!
I don't consider a taunt as personal info.
You led with the women not wanting me personally as photographer. I came back with the fact that women insist on me watching them disrobe. That statement intimidates all guys like you who have to buy magazines and porn movies to see even one naked lady.
Those selfie addicts are not the people with the paparazzi chasing and taking pictures of them, and you are oblivious to how much a good photographer costs. It doesn't help that paparazzi got framed for the death of Princess Diana,either. The photographers started charging uncomely women double, so those women started taking and distributing pictures of themselves.
It's a good thing that the porn industry won't accept selfies, else it would lose millions.
i didnt ask for personal infos.
can you explain me why you consider selfies to be bad and especially for women?
In fact, the females are usually insistent that I stay in a room with them when they disrobe for a body wax, but I am unskilled in doing Brazilian.
And what would you know about my training with the camera? I will have you know that I have top knotch cinematography skills. That's besides the point though, there are many photographers of elite level being affected by this selfie craze.
selfies exist because women dont want to hire someone like YOU as a photographer :)