The debate "Should America accept more Middle Eastern refugees into the country" was started by
October 1, 2015, 7:17 am.
18 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 13 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
sighnomore99 posted 2 arguments, abdulhadi posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
Hitmenjr posted 2 arguments, Alex posted 2 arguments to the disagreers part.
sighnomore99, Superr1fifty, Tiger1738, Skeetc15, J_Blue, wmd, Yuki_Amayane, shawncola, Eechyobooty, ailasorecarg and 8 visitors agree.
abdulhadi, Hitmenjr, Alex, Anas, AstroSpace, bigB, opinionsvsfacts and 6 visitors disagree.
There is as far as I know not much room in Europe for new housing.
I said In Europe...But we don't have any US territories over in that area... millitary bases excluded...and to send them to a US territory would be a logistical nightmare...But not immpossible...
I like your idea. Even if we build these homes, the people will still be in a bad area controlled by ISIS.
What we need is a US controlled area in these countries protected ground and air by the US. Then these people will be safe from ISIS, but not in the US.
To big of a berdon on American citizens...Instead we should send our unemployed civil engineers and build temporary housing in Europe on a large scale...Then train and employ some of the refugees to maintain the utilities like plumbing and electricity.
That is a really good point. However, you can't change the past, so now we have to deal with this issue.
I rather think that that america should stop making refugees in those countries.were there any refugees and ISIS before america attacked Iraq and Afghanistan?
So, my view on this is that we should allow special relaxed immigration principles for refugees. They can live and work here for as long as they need to, so long as they are contributing (working, volunteering- doing something that is productive),