The debate "Should children be the reason why parents should not divorce" was started by
November 4, 2015, 10:29 am.
By the way, MylifeisaJoke is disagreeing with this statement.
13 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 29 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
Sumerian posted 1 argument, Apollo8 posted 1 argument, SalonY posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
liberalssuck, Picassota, I_talk2_Much, ThePhilosopher, ceedotrock and 8 visitors agree.
MylifeisaJoke, Sumerian, wmd, PsychDave, wayneSPEC, Yuki_Amayane, Apollo8, ajuna, toffeebrush, debaterjr, scotthansonMC, TheControversy, llemponen, alexoliver, SalonY, Ematio, Emily_P, Marlize, Moonlight and 10 visitors disagree.
well children can be a weak reason... Divorce take place due to many reasons...it doesnot mean that divorce always has bad impacts on children....for example if parents are always fighting or blaming each other...thn it will creat worse impact then divorce...
1. In the light of the parent's happiness, I can never say that divorce is the best choice nor is staying the better choice too. It is a matter of their preference and belief.
2. On the matter of taking care of the child, even if I become a single parent, it doesn't mean I'm less capable to love my child. I can be divorced but still supportive. Technical matters on division of care of the child is not my forte so sorry.
3. But on the matter of where the child will grow best emotionally, I think its more of a matter of how well life is explained to the child, by matter of culture, education and guidance.
sometime the children should be the reason for which parent should divorce.
In cases like domestic violence. Seeing such scene at home may be poor for growth of children. So it is better to divorce sometimes.