The debate "Should fake news be protected under the first amendment's right to free speech." was started by
July 28, 2018, 9:08 pm.
23 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 30 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
Aaronr12 posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
maulik, Jasleen, Aaronr12, YEET and 19 visitors agree.
SaffronSHAM3 and 29 visitors disagree.
I do not like CNN or other left wing networks, but they have the right to say what they want I have a right not to listen or watch.
Considering the crazy conspiracies that come from it, yes
so would you support shutting down info wars?
fake news to me is rumors spread to cause harm so it is not protected as it cause harm to others.
I too would like to see examples of this fabrication and sullying.
could you provide examples of when this has been used against trump?
but i guess he does so many terrible things so consistently that if even 2-3% were fake that could be dozens.
I define fake news as the purposeful staging and fabricating of events or stories used in order to spark fear, sling mud, or sully the reputation of an individual or a group of individuals for different reasons or agendas. In recent times, this has been used repeatedly against Trump but it isn't right if used by or against anybody.
and how would you define "fake news"? to some people it means anyone who won't kiss Trump's a** every single minute.
what do you think?