The debate "Should prisoners get a second chance" was started by
January 17, 2019, 5:32 pm.
50 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 36 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
District9 posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
DrMrDaniel posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
Soph25161818, Ural, handkerchief, Argument_fightme, ErnestoChiTun, Nemiroff, Kronicle, Dmoderate32, millennialmale, nativeRepublican, finthechat, District9, tmjcb99, Napoleon_of_Politics, eva_pet35 and 35 visitors agree.
dazzasanta420, DrMrDaniel, lucky, seefus, district10 and 31 visitors disagree.
Depends on what they have done. If they are doning live then they did something bad to deserve that and shouldn't be trust to fix themselves however I do think there is a moral side to everyone and if a prisoner gets released then it is up to them to turn their life around
That seems to be a very narrow view of the issue. Most people commit crimes regularly, (speeding, jaywalking etc). In many cases it doesn't take all that much for something to escalate to the point of criminality.
As an example. You go to a bar with your friends and a guy insults you. it leads to a fight. you throw one punch and he hits his head on the bar and dies. You only threw one punch at a jerk, but you are now a murderer. Should you be locked up for the rest of your life? what good does that do anyone?
Society already gave those prisoners a chance and they decided to violate it. Why let, for example, a murder have a second chance so he can murder again.