Should the U.S ban military and civilian drones

April 24, 2015, 9:40 am

Agree6 Disagree7

46%
54%

The debate "Should the U.S ban military and civilian drones" was started by cr1813 on April 24, 2015, 9:40 am. 6 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 7 people are on the disagree side. People are starting to choose their side. It looks like most people are against to this statement.

PsychDave posted 1 argument to the disagreers part. posted the first argument on this debate as a disagreeing part.

cr1813 and 5 visitors agree.
PsychDave, transfanboy, Sosocratese, I_Voyager and 3 visitors disagree.

Banning a technology accomplishes nothing. Military drones are a useful tool to save the lives of your troops. If you have the choice of sending men into hostile territory to scout or sending an unmanned drone, the drone goes. If you are conducting risky sir raids on a military target, you can either risk your pilots, as well as millions of dollars in hardware, or send a drone. Still expensive, but stuff can be replaced, people can't.

As to banning civilian drones, they would also have to ban remote control helicopters and planes since both are capable of doing the same thing as a drone, just possibly not as well.

3 years, 7 months ago
Discuss "Should the U.S ban military and civilian drones" politics
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.