The debate "Should there be a guys movement" was started by
March 14, 2017, 6:33 pm.
10 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 9 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
neveralone posted 3 arguments, Nemiroff posted 2 arguments, thereal posted 3 arguments to the agreers part.
neveralone, thereal, blue_rayy, theshadow0, human, Pugsly, Jericho, SirIntegra and 2 visitors agree.
diana26, EthanTReilly, makson and 6 visitors disagree.
he doesn't have an opinion, he's just looking to get people to respond to his bombastic claims or insults. it's like a child throwing a temper tantrum knowing that he'll get attention by doing so.
You don't consider suppressing someone's rights brutish?
Its not brutish. Unless youre a beta male of course.
they got rights to. movements have been known to work and I'm fine with them until they get outrageous. though this isn't about the feminist movement.
that's not masculine. that's brutish.
I dont think starting a "men's movement" should be the thing to do. i think the men should be supressing the feminists, that would be more masculine and manly than whining in the streets with sign boards...
the fact that research shows women earn MORE for the same job than their male counterparts...
yeah the court system definitely favors women.
divorce court inequalities. paternal leave to be with a new born.
now right now such a movement won't get a lot done because as far as I know there isn't any injustices on men besides abortion but such a group might make sure we keep our rights. this is not an attack on feminism.