The debate "SJW is cancer and should be stopped" was started by
March 11, 2017, 9:29 pm.
7 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 3 people are on the disagree side.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
Pugsly posted 6 arguments to the agreers part.
Nemiroff posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
Pugsly, thereal, human, Jericho and 3 visitors agree.
blue_rayy, historybuff and 1 visitor disagree.
blm has had a couple of riots of varying sizes but the vast VAST majority of its demonstrations were peaceful... so they aren't huge shit heads. just because a small retarded group is extra loud does not make them a majority.
if you truly believe that a majority represents the movement then I 100% agree with you. however, once again, I feel you are getting all your information regarding both views and which one is a majority from highly biased sites who actively try to push a certain perspective regardless of reality. the left has those types of sources as well, fortunately they are nowhere near as popular.
please, list the blm movements that went violent, and I'll respond with a list 10x longer of peaceful demonstrations with far far more people.
also it would be nice if you would somehow relate this back to SJWs, or are you just shifting topics so we never settle anything?
in order for your post to make any sense you would need to prove that the Majority of sjw are what you think they are. otherwise you are just some idiot rambling about things you don't understand based on heavily biased sources.
Okay I'm going to explain this very simply to you; when a group has a huge active people and that becomes the face of the group then that's the way the party is. For example if the BLM movement didn't have huge riots in its name then they wouldn't be considered a group of shit heads. See how the majority over runs the few.
and I can slow you tee-shirt of Republicans saying racist shit... does that mean all Republicans are racist because 1 decided to wear a particular shirt? I have a strong suspicion you get most of your info about feminists from wrecked feminist, and similar sources for "sjw's" and other "left wing" groups.
it's OK to get your right wing info from right wing sources, but please, don't get your left wing info from right wing sources... not if you want actual info at least.
your joke you tube channels don't really matter, why don't you just Google the definition or use any dictionary. an opposing group can't define their opposition. that's like asking a Hindu to define Christianity instead of actually asking a christian.
SJW is a group not a description. You can see this in social media very well. Just go to YouTube and look it up people make fun of them all the time.
The definition of Feminism is the equality of both sexs. Feminist today have mugs that say male tears. Would you say they're in the same boat as the ones in the 1920's?
sjw isn't a group. it's a description. it describes feminists, racial rights, religious rights, mens rights, immigrants rights, many many many groups.
if you fight social injustice, you are a social justice warrior... it's in the name.
are mgtows fighting against a social injustice?
what exactly is the difference?
SJW'S aren't MGTOW and those two groups would be insulted.
unfortunately, the definition of sjw is in no way limited to college campuses. it involves anyone on a personal crusade for a social justice.
you identified a social injustice (marriage towards men) and you fight against it (like a warrior)... the specific type doesn't matter. I'm sure you would consider the SJW feminists or other activists as SJWs, why wouldn't MGTOWs (first time seeing that acronym lol) not also fit under the SJW umbrella? they certainly fit the definition.
also, aren't those SJWs allowed to express their speech? ignorant as it may be?
Go look it up you have no idea what it is. SJW'S try to fight free speech at colleges and yet still try to say they're oppressed.
Go look up SJW before you talk; the marriage thing was a MGTOW point.
aren't you the same guy who just declared marriage a cancer to men?
sounds like you are a SJW as well. fighting against the injustice in marriage.
why are you calling yourself a cancer?
because fighting for justice is bad?