The debate "Social justice is not true justice." was started by
JDAWG9693 on
February 4, 2019, 6:52 pm.
36 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 20 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
JDAWG9693 posted 4 arguments, killer posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
JDAWG9693, IamKudzaiTC, SMNR, finthechat, killer, HRGertge, lukeluckynuke123, Hellow, sssk and 27 visitors agree.
YaBoyPatches, amir_alhakim07 and 18 visitors disagree.
That is based on morale. Some people think social justice is right, so they boast anything they think is offensive.
Although if a Social justice worrier attacks you, it's because they don't like your opinion. Social Justice isn't necessarily being just. Because the people that are, I haven't seen them try to actually reason their thoughts.
So it's the people that are unjust that they're social Justice for society. Not the word it self. Because they done nothing to make it of Justice. Just a bunch of people screaming and yelling.
Social justice can be justice though. What are you going to defend though? If they were all for society, they would not attack people. Let's be real here. How many social justice people actually provide common sense? I haven't seen one yet. Not saying all of them are bad.
So SJW arnt doing any Justice. Because they attack people because they don't agree with them. They will defend one thing and insult the other. All of them may not do that, but social Justice isn't needed because no one that is Social Justice actually do any Justice.
His morality, for sure. I'm talking about his view on justice.
https://fee.org/articles/justice-versus-social-justice/
^^^ This is a good article to read on what I'm talking about
he didnt mention feudalism. I said feudalists and dictators would love his morality.
I mentioned his view that some humans should be slaves, and while excellence is a trait you inherit. I dont know anything about his desserts, but what I do know is that by today's standards his morality is sh*t.
I'm not talking about his feudalism, I'm talking about when he discusses desserts.
Aristotle believed some people are naturally born to be slaves while others were naturally born with excellence. I'm sure feudalists and dictators love him.
if that is "true justice" then I'm glad social justice doesnt fit that. I would say most forms of justice are more just then aristotelian justice. maybe you want to reevaluate your definition of true justice. between those 2, social justice wins hands down.
are you not arguing for your own form of social justice?
I'm comparing it to Aristotle's version of justice
are you comparing social justice to legal justice? or to the idea of ideal justice? (which is kinda an unfair comparison in every case)
Social justice is often based on identity politics, while real justice is when a person gets what he deserves (whether good or bad).
what is true justice? and is it realisitic?