The debate "That shooting broke the record yet no change in gun laws" was started by
October 3, 2017, 10:55 pm.
11 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 4 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
blue_rayy posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
blue_rayy, dkokkinis, fishermo20 and 8 visitors agree.
SirIntegra and 3 visitors disagree.
He did not obey any gun laws. You only want fools to obey laws you write so they can easily be killed or robbed by a gun thief, and then you'll laugh after the fool dies obeying you.
The deadly shooting that killed 59 people and injured 530 people is just an another example of how an unchanged and ineffective gun laws can do to people.
Well Steven Paddock, the 64 yr old shooter had no criminal records and he obtained all those 10 guns legally. He used automatic and semi-automatic guns which can be bought from gun shops without much hassle or documents.
NO AMERICAN SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO OWN SUCH KINDS OF WEAPONS.
Well, The conservatives are now gonna argue that 'guns are needed to topple an unwanted govt. as well as to protect people where law is out of reach'.
let me say you, the government which spends 500 billion $ to maintain its military hardware . Now some people forming militias thinking about overthrowing the government is an idiotic act. LOL.
And the sole aim of conservatives is to 'arm everyone' . If everyone one was armed during the country music festival in Las Vegas, does that ensure that the people could take out the shooter yards away on 32nd floor of Mandalay Bay Hotel?
NOPE. The situation would have been worse. Peole would have shot each other mistakely.
Now time's spilling away.... After Pulse club shooting and now the Las Vegas shooting, only time can say about the next shootout.