The british monarchy should be replaced with an elected king or queen

June 16, 2017, 11:10 am

Agree3 Disagree4


The debate "The british monarchy should be replaced with an elected king or queen" was started by thereal on June 16, 2017, 11:10 am. 3 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 4 people are on the disagree side. There needs to be more votes to see what the common perception is. It looks like most people are against to this statement.

thereal posted 4 arguments to the agreers part.
PsychDave posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.

thereal and 2 visitors agree.
PsychDave, historybuff and 2 visitors disagree.

replied to...

It is better to be silent and thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt, and yet you keep talking.

Seriously, if you don't have an argument, either concede or stop posting. Fishing for your opponent to come up with one for you is just lazy and shows you have nothing left to add.

2 years ago

its better to sound stupid to a stupid person than to actually be the stupid person (you).

2 years ago

the royal family has no power or control over anything. why would replacing them be necessary? how would it be an improvement?

if you want to debate saying things like "use your brain, then youll find out." makes you sound stupid.

2 years ago

use your brain, then youll find out.

2 years ago

why? in what way is this an improvement?

2 years ago

The politician who wins the election would adopt the position of elected King and become the Head of State. Other than that, his job would be the same as PM with no change.

2 years ago

The current hereditary monarchy should be replaced with an elected monarchy. what i mean by this is that the royal family should be fully removed from that post in british society because they represent colonialism and oppression etc. instead, the post of Prime Minister should be abolished and the politician who wins the election should adopt the position of King or Queen depending on whether its a woman or a man obviously. This would be much fairer and abolish traces of oppression and colonialism, whilst maintaining the historical british tradition of having a king or queen. except the king or queen would be elected and replaced every 5 years or remain for a second term if they win the election.

2 years ago
Discuss "The british monarchy should be replaced with an elected king or queen" entertainment
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.