The debate "The definition of the word gay should changed" was started by
July 1, 2015, 4:21 pm.
By the way, amanofprogress is disagreeing with this statement.
7 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 21 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
amanofprogress posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
PsychDave posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
WordsDoMatter and 6 visitors agree.
amanofprogress, PsychDave, Sosocratese, sidp31, sabrina, Quantum, Bxat9, alexithymia, kaka, kizrox, Enigma, Georgi_ZKL24, bearunter, musejay1 and 7 visitors disagree.
1) Changing the word will not stop bigotry or hate. Many racial slurs are banned, but people are still racist. Banning the words people use doesn't stop the hate, at best it just changes how it is expressed. The only way to change the sentiment is to work on the root cause of the hate and intolerance, which unfortunately in this case is unlikely to be effective since it is largely religiously based.
2) Calling something gay because it is stereotypically associated with homosexual people would not change the fact that the behavior or item would still be stereotypically associated with them. Changing the word would simply change what people call everything currently associated with it. The only way to change this would be to change what stereotypes are associated with homosexuality.
I don't doubt that language will continue to change and mutate as it always has, but I don't feel that forcing a vocabulary change would accomplish anything meaningful.
reason 1: it will take away a word used for bigotry that originally was used for joy, reason 2: many people when they say gay are talkin less about an actuall homosexual and more the stereotype of one, a stereotypical metrosexual, this will mean you could be straight and "gay" and homosexual and co pletely un "gay"