The debate "The media should be prevented by law from intruding on the lives of public figures" was started by
April 29, 2015, 2:44 pm.
100 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 36 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
PsychDave posted 1 argument, I_Voyager posted 1 argument, Getmurked posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
Chabii, raz, AdamChase, jonatron5, scooter6381, sdiop and 94 visitors agree.
PsychDave, I_Voyager, Getmurked, ufufugh and 32 visitors disagree.
the news should cover anything worth coveeimg, but it should stop the incessant lies. not everyone, but some do lie and twist stories and decieve, or are biased to the point of no return. i think there should be a law to prevent these mishaps.
I agree with Psychdave. The media includes the news. Public politics is news. Celebrity "news" is entertainment. News should do what it needs to to inform the citizenry, including disrupting the life of politicians and the like. But actors aren't important enough to interfier with.
It depends on the public figure. Politicians are supposed to represent their constituents, so if they are doing something unethical or something that impacts their office, it is reasonable to report on it. If it is an actor who is having her dinner disrupted by photographers, then yes.