The debate "There are very few 'facts' in existence" was started by
August 15, 2014, 2:37 am.
22 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 13 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
akshay58165 posted 1 argument, Kirito posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
tkershaw3, true_debate_life, TheDentedHelmet, Mr_Anonymous, Portia_Yov, zelda42o, KaterinaVinther, wmd, djrayjay123, jessicaS02, andrej, Mikey2k, Blindness and 9 visitors agree.
akshay58165, Kirito, Sosocratese, sickboyblonde, slash606, giveuspeacedamnitt, I_Voyager, PsychDave, werdninja, AdamChase, stormshy and 2 visitors disagree.
I agree with Akshay. In science there are in fact many facts. People have devoted textbooks upon textbooks about facts in science. A fact can be defined as anything that is true... correct. well lets take trees for instance we know that they need Sun, water, and soil. Those are facts are they not? There are many others just on flora and fanna alone. Just go to a typical science textbook and it is chocked full of facts. The question I believe you ment was that there are not any NEW facts in science today. Well even there you are wrong people are discovering new things EVERYDAY from robotics, to deep sea.
Everything around us if we keep discovering will result into a fact. The end point of reaching a conclusion, results in producing a fact. The few facts that we know are produced. Facts are everywhere, if you can't claim that there are 1000 stars in the sky then you will say that there are uncountable stars in the sky. And this is a fact until scientists discover the actuality. Facts can be replaced according to the discovery.