The debate "There is Evidence for the Flood in Genesis" was started by
December 31, 2019, 1:21 pm.
8 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 10 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
jrardin12 posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
TheExistentialist posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
jrardin12, Wolfie, abie and 5 visitors agree.
diecinueve, TheExistentialist, JDAWG9693, historybuff, Thandaza3 and 5 visitors disagree.
This, would in fact, be evidence against the flood myth. If the flood were responsible for all fossilization, then you'd have fossils of all animals evenly strewn about the planet. However, because the fossilization process requires specific environmental factors, there are only a few select places on earth during each time period where you have fossil concentrations. This would not be the case in a global event. Therefore we can safely say that fossilization events were very isolated rather than global.
1. The special way fossils are made is my first evidence. An animal must be buried rapidly in order to form a fossil. Many animals were buried so rapidly that they were trapped while eating or giving birth.