There is no Hard imperical evidence of any god/goddess

July 11, 2015, 5:24 pm

Agree30 Disagree16

65%
35%

The debate "There is no Hard imperical evidence of any god/goddess" was started by jonatron5 on July 11, 2015, 5:24 pm. 30 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 16 people are on the disagree side. That might be enough to see the common perception. It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.

PsychDave posted 1 argument, I_Voyager posted 1 argument to the agreers part.


jonatron5, sabrina, PsychDave, Shi, BernieSanders4pres, Sosocratese, I_Voyager, Afshin, Girl101, oscar, spellbeechamp, Mehdigx, aceofhearts, dylan21502, nickc123, sidhant, Your_dad and 13 visitors agree.
kayalaan, Foreverduke9, denno27, DerpedLocke, Skeetc15, TruthSeekerCivilSpeaker and 10 visitors disagree.

I meant to agree with you Dave, but I guess my mouse didn't concur...

4 years, 4 months ago

This debate was had a while ago and the end result was that the only form of proof anyone was able to offer was that, as some people believe in God, he is true to them and that is sufficient proof. There was debate over whether faith and belief constituted proof, but either way it would not qualify as empirical evidence.

Unless anyone has any evidence to offer, I don't see how they can vote that such evidence exists.

4 years, 4 months ago
Discuss "There is no Hard imperical evidence of any god/goddess" philosophy religion science
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.