The debate "There should be a mandatory law requiring all parents to vaccinate their children if not allergic" was started by
July 20, 2018, 2:51 am.
49 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 17 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
historybuff posted 1 argument, MajorGeneralX posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
historybuff posted 2 arguments to the disagreers part.
MajorGeneralX, historybuff, itenodnail, luljeta101, SaffronSHAM3 and 44 visitors agree.
AGustafson, HelloWorLd and 15 visitors disagree.
Yes, let's stick to vaccines
a fetus isn't legal person. it might become one if allowed to develop. but that is a different debate.
so does abortion right?
also I don't know why the app keeps changing my vote.
because it isn't only about their children. there are alot of people who can't get vaccinated for valid medical reasons. they are protected by herd imunity. if alot of people make bad decisions based on nonsense they not only put their own children at risk, they put lots of other people at risk too.
even if it were only about their child, I would still make the argument that not vaccinating your children shouldn't be allowed. the parents are endangering their child for no reason. if we can legally require parents use seat belts on their children, we can require they vaccinate them.
that's the parents choice. if u think they should vaccinate their children why can't u just have a conversation with them about the benefits of doing so?
your a right winger no? wouldnt that be governmental overreach?