The debate "Things would have been better if women continued not working" was started by
March 3, 2017, 5:49 pm.
3 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 6 people are on the disagree side.
There needs to be more votes to see what the common perception is.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
InksEvermore posted 4 arguments to the agreers part.
InksEvermore, thereal and 1 visitor agree.
human, makson and 4 visitors disagree.
another reason is not knowing how to spend. impulse buying. and just stupid with money. all are seen in society today and since we got all that money
If two people in a household work making double the amount of income we have now. then that would correlate to what you said.
overspending correlates to more money more workers. which caused the wages to be cut. am i not wrong?
this isn't because women came in but because of the crash and overspending.
In a way a lot of families are working double the amount of the time for the same amount of income you would have made say in the 50s
I think honestly it would have been much better. The pay for men would have been the same back then since it was worth dpuble the income now. But I do think women should have continued to have the opportunity to work if lets say a single mom or a single lady. It would have been a much better set up and I feel like it would have been a lot more healthier and happier if that makes sense. of course i dont expect you to agree. this is more of an opinion rather than a strict statement
could u explain?