The debate "Trump is the Anti-christ" was started by
February 23, 2017, 4:21 pm.
11 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 15 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
thereal posted 12 arguments to the agreers part.
PsychDave posted 8 arguments, Ematio posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
thereal, skeletonbones, keeliAnna and 8 visitors agree.
Your_dad, PsychDave, MrShine, historybuff, Yanksxx21, Ematio, n59690, UnderdogMike, human, braymus17, makson and 4 visitors disagree.
I apologize. You are right, you have never claimed to be Christian. You are still an idiot who can't seem to grasp how debates work, but I apologize for calling you Christian.
And your proof is what? There are lots of accusations, but none that stand up to scrutiny. If she has committed so many crimes, why is her record substantial better than Trump's? She has never had to settle lawsuits over racist practices.
Okay, she has not been convicted of any crime, but she has committed many
Lmao, i never ever even claimed to be christian you stupid liberal ****** lololol. Why are you so stupid? is it genetic? are your parents as stupid as you? are you a cuck because your dad watched your neighbour bareback your mom? LOL. Just because i know more about Christianity than you doesnt mean im Christian. what a clown you are. Get an education, peasant.
In case you can't look it up on your own, here is a link to what the Bible has to say about swearing.
I apologize if I was giving you too much credit thinking you knew you could remove your vote after making a topic. Since this is obviously new information to you, I will try to teach you the basics of this app rather than assume you are already moderately competent.
I pointed out that he had run a smear campaign against Clinton as well as other people. You attacked Clinton's character with further baseless slander. How you think that is relevant to Trump eludes me, but perhaps if you spent half as much time working on your debate skills as you seem to your insults you would be able to make a valid point out of it.
Since reason doesn't seem to be your strong point, I will try to use little words. Insults don't convince me not to vote for the person being insulted. Saying someone is bad doesn't make me think they are unless there is proof. It does lower my opinion of the one being insulting who can't back them up with proof. Much like talking to you.
You should give up swearing for lent because you are supposed to do something difficult to show your sacrifice (and for you swearing definitely qualifies). You also should because it is repeatedly condemned in the Bible. If you can't even be a good Christian for a month, you should probably find a new faith.
Why should i give up swearing for lent? can you explain why swearing is bad? I mean you support slags walking around with their tits out as a "form of expression" (which is complete bs) but you are against me swearing when i talk, which actually IS a form of expression? liberal stupidity strikes again folks.
"Smear campaigns do not convince me to vote for or against someone. That doesn't mean they don't influence how I view the person doing the smearing. ", well thats a load of bollock shit because it obviously DOES influence whether or not you vote for someone. After all, if you see that person as a good leader etc, youre more likely to vote for them than if it was the opposite. Your common sense is lacking.
Also, i did not respond to you saying Trump was not the antichrist by attacking Clintons character, rather that comment was in response to you saying "He ran a smear campaign. Calling his opponent "crooked Hillary", " so maybe you should actually read back your own comments or instead remember what you said rather than displaying the memory of a 80 year old with alzheimers, which you currently possess. either that or youre intentionally being a misleading liberal cuck. i think its the last one.
I didnt "press agree on the topic", the app automatically agrees to any topic you create by default. Maybe you would know that if you actually created debates more often and werent a pussy a** beta male who needs everybody else to lead in debate topics.
In case the face escaped you, you pressed agree on the topic. The topic is "Trump is the Antichrist". That means you have literally agreed that Trump is the Antichrist.
Beyond that simple fact, I wasn't commenting on your position, I was commenting on the stupidity of your argument. I said Trump was not the Antichrist, and you responded by attacking Clinton's character. If you fail to see why that is a stupid line of argument, you are beyond hope.
I apologize. Apparently I missed part of that comment.
Smear campaigns do not convince me to vote for or against someone. That doesn't mean they don't influence how I view the person doing the smearing.
Perhaps you should give up swearing for lent. It might benefit everyone.
"Smear campaigns do not convince me to vote for or against someone. That doesn't mean they don't influence the person doing the smearing.", that literally makes no sense you dumbass LOL.
Youre accusing me of claiming that Trump is the antichrist when i very clearly said "I dont believe that, i just wanna be entertained by what Najam, PsychDave etc say about it.", that just about shows that youre a complete retard with the iq of a 4 year old. Or in other words, youre just a liberal lmfao.
Well if her not being convicted of anything means that shes not a criminal, then neither was Jack the Ripper, Gaddafi, Assad, Tony Blair or George Bush. Youre a complete f***tard and you know it but your pride is stopping you from admitting it.
Smear campaigns do not convince me to vote for or against someone. That doesn't mean they don't influence the person doing the smearing. Your inability to reason reflect you, not me.
As to calling her crooked Hillary, what crime has she been convicted of? If you can't provide a conviction, she is not a criminal.
To be fair, this shouldn't surprise me. You are attacking my position that he is not the Antichrist by attacking Clinton. That about sums up your approach to debate.
He called her Crooked Hillary because she is Crooked. Shes always been that way.
Well PsychoticDave, you just very clearly stated you dont like him because he ran a smear campaign and then you said that doesnt affect you, rational policy does. You just contradicted yourself. Be consistent, child.
And I don't care if some immature child thinks I'm "salty".
He ran a smear campaign. Calling his opponent "crooked Hillary", saying he preferred his heroes not be captured, criticizing the mother of a US veteran killed defending America, and generally insulting and attacking anyone who disagreed with or in any way opposed him. Attack ads don't convince me who to vote for. Policy and rational plans for the future do.
Lol i can smell the salt eminating from you LOL. I can just tell how sour you are??. Whats wrong with the way he ran? He won didnt he? I dont think he cares if some wimpy beta male has no respect for him.
Then get your head out of your mother's baking cupboard. I had little respect for him before he ran, little respect for how he ran, and he has done nothing to earn Mt respect since taking office. If he does a great job as president, I will admit I was wrong, but so far his presidency has been a farce.
i can smell the salt from here...
Trump is an idiot and is only out for himself, but he is hardly the Antichrist. Sorry if that disappointed you.
I dont believe that, i just wanna be entertained by what Najam, PsychDave etc say about it.
what makes u think that? the anti Christ is supposed to unite the earth. he is making walls