The debate "Ukraine crisis can be stopped by blocking all Russian borderes in air land and sea" was started by
February 23, 2015, 11:34 am.
15 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 20 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
Superr1fifty posted 4 arguments to the agreers part.
bitman posted 1 argument, PsychDave posted 1 argument, Mr_Anonymous posted 2 arguments to the disagreers part.
Superr1fifty, kennediharris515, Egert_Clueless, olilongboat, Bodaciouslady16, Untamed and 9 visitors agree.
bitman, Martin2489, PsychDave, Mr_Anonymous, shinywhale and 15 visitors disagree.
Enyway it probably would stop it if we somehow managed to do that.
And in the process destroy ourselves. America has no room to talk here. We've been doing this for quite a while
Exactly. But then we can blow them up whenever we want!
And that's how you start ww3
Yes. I think it would be better just to invent an antimatter missile, then say to Russia: *** ****** if Ukraine crisis won't end till next month we will fire that missile right in to your ******* country!
That is a very simplistic solution that couldn't work. First because there is just too much boarder, ports, and airports in Russia. It is a huge place, so sealing the border is impossible. Second, even if the USA and Europe agreed to work together to try, how do you convince China to? Finally, if you tried to starve Russia out by sealing the borders, they would have to fight to prevent it. That would be far more likely to prompt a major war.
If everyone would make eny transition in/out Russia illiegal.
It's impossible to block all Russian ports or it's border