The debate "US Army should intervene in other countries wars" was started by
June 2, 2015, 4:50 am.
15 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 27 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
PsychDave posted 1 argument, Damn3d posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
toughgamerjerry posted 1 argument, vumtucks posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
Eagle528, PsychDave, GetRekt, Damn3d, ombatra1997 and 10 visitors agree.
WordSpeller, Bodaciouslady16, toughgamerjerry, vumtucks, RosieRose, soullesschicken, Hanif_abdat, thatjonathanguy, wmd, DanielleR123, CJismyname12, sabrina, Turtle, desght, steady_current and 12 visitors disagree.
Intervene is a different word. What US usually did was interfere.
It depends. If they are asked or if it is something like ISIS, then yes they should intervene. But we should not just but in on other people's business.
If asked for help, and there are not human rights concerns, yes.