US Army should intervene in other countries wars

June 2, 2015, 4:50 am

Agree15 Disagree27


The debate "US Army should intervene in other countries wars" was started by Eagle528 on June 2, 2015, 4:50 am. 15 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 27 people are on the disagree side. That might be enough to see the common perception. It looks like most people are against to this statement.

PsychDave posted 1 argument, Damn3d posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
toughgamerjerry posted 1 argument, vumtucks posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.

Eagle528, PsychDave, GetRekt, Damn3d, ombatra1997 and 10 visitors agree.
WordSpeller, Bodaciouslady16, toughgamerjerry, vumtucks, RosieRose, soullesschicken, Hanif_abdat, thatjonathanguy, wmd, DanielleR123, CJismyname12, sabrina, Turtle, desght, steady_current and 12 visitors disagree.

@vumtucks With?

4 years ago

Intervene is a different word. What US usually did was interfere.

4 years ago

It depends. If they are asked or if it is something like ISIS, then yes they should intervene. But we should not just but in on other people's business.

4 years ago

If asked for help, and there are not human rights concerns, yes.

4 years ago
Discuss "US Army should intervene in other countries wars" news others politics
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.