The debate "We don't need to learn history just because Everyone should know that" was started by
Potato on
June 12, 2019, 1:03 pm.
10 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 40 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
Potato posted 1 argument, maksonmakson posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
sakshi posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
Potato, hollieg, maksonmakson, Bratzela, yoitzflex and 5 visitors agree.
Nemiroff, ShiroSpeaks, JDAWG9693, bernie, Allirix, PG, MADHURA, Threelip, babymarie, sssk, boispendaddy, MrStealyogrill, nikhil, Communistguy and 26 visitors disagree.
I think that we should learn what happened in the past, but in a bit different way. And if the reason is because everyone would know that, then it's stupid, but find yourself another reasons.
history is all about past and the way people survived..it's good and benifical because we get to know the Things which our ancestors done wrong and we'll not repeat them...so this must be taught ...
The text formatting here is shitty. It says 'Because "Everyone should know that"'. Like the thing teachers say.
I'm not sure I understand the topic. Your argument is that we shouldn't teach children history because they should already know it? how would they know it if we don't teach them?