The debate "We don't value children's arguments" was started by
November 14, 2015, 8:51 pm.
22 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 4 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
toffeebrush, mtemple74, WaspToxin, MarlemR, AstroSpace, wmd, Nury, Tiredandred, DannyknowsItAll and 13 visitors agree.
liberalssuck and 3 visitors disagree.
I don't value your arguments because
you are extremely racist and call people names you should not say at 11.
I value a child's argument if the argument is good, and logical.
it is hard for a child to have good logical arguments because children's brains are not developed fully and their education is not very high.
It depends. Maybe you consider them as "children's arguments" because you are neglecting them even before you try to understand where they're coming from.
On the other hand, it could also be a plainly shallow argument so yes you might be right.
Or is it at a literal sense?