We should have death penalty

January 21, 2016, 10:02 am

Agree8 Disagree10


The debate "We should have death penalty" was started by KoEun on January 21, 2016, 10:02 am. 8 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 10 people are on the disagree side. People are starting to choose their side. It looks like most people are against to this statement.

historybuff posted 2 arguments, reece posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.

KoEun, ReadyToBegin, reece, wmd, starsnclovers and 3 visitors agree.
historybuff, danielle, Theblackhandxix, aftermath, SwaggerPoptart and 5 visitors disagree.

The death penalty's purpose is not meant to reduce crime..it is meant to give criminals the necessary punishment that they deserve for the level of crime that they've committed..so for you to say the death penalty is 'ineffective' is absurd..it is very much effective for the criminals that commit the most heinous crimes.

3 years ago

deter not better.

3 years ago

the death penalty has been proven to be ineffective. it doesn't better crime, it costs more, it takes up way more of the justice system's time, it is irreversible if a mistake is made. there simply isn't an up side to it.

3 years ago
Discuss "We should have death penalty" others politics society
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.