The debate "What is actually wrong with fascism" was started by
April 12, 2017, 8:01 am.
By the way, thereal is disagreeing with this statement.
4 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 5 people are on the disagree side.
There needs to be more votes to see what the common perception is.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
thereal posted 4 arguments to the agreers part.
Nemiroff posted 2 arguments, thereal posted 4 arguments to the disagreers part.
4 visitors agree.
thereal and 4 visitors disagree.
sometimes I feel it's easier to talk to najam. he makes nonsense and mostly repeats the same thing, but at least he understands who is talking to who and doesn't get confused every 2 seconds.
Thereal, there is a button that says "reply". I know this may seem hard for you to understand, but it is used when you want to reply to someone. Otherwise you just look like you have no idea how the app work. It's fine if you are new to the app, but you should have at least worked out the basics by now.
oh shit are you gna take that Nemiroff? Psychdave the inbreed called you a nobody!
Thereal, are you just talking to yourself here, or are you trying to debate? You aren't replying to anyone, so this must simply be a standalone statement, meaning you are just talking to yourself.
Lmao you have something wrong with your chromosomes, they do say a stupid person never believes that they are stupid and you are a prime example of that.
you have obviously haven't looked at syria. a nation oppressing it's people and was (before the civil war) growing in wealth.
and yes, you shouldn't say demolished after ranting irrelevant words in a string. I was hoping you'd see how stupid it makes you sound.
and you dont "demolish" arguments by posting an irrelevant statement lmfao you just never learn do you? I think youre starting to feel bad about yourself.
No because a country which oppresses its citizens would be poor, not rich you dumbf***. lmao you tried.
so your saying there has never been a nation that got wealthy while oppressing it's people... clearly there is some divergence there. you may have to reevaluate your definitions, and your understanding of history.
Nation- a large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular state or territory.
That is literally the definition of nation and youre still arguing that working for the nation and working for the people are 2 different things like a retard.
Lmao you said that the bad thing about fascism is that it puts the nation above the people in the nation when the literal f***ing definition of nation is a large body of people, you camel.
In terms of communism and fascism, they both are focused on the nation. The only way they are different is in the way that they deal with the people. In fact f*** you because all govt systems are focused on the nation above the so-called individual, even more so in a democracy where majority wins. When has an individual ever been prioritised above the nation in a democracy? Never.
if people and nation are interchangeable, then to should have no problem with communism whose core value is pretty much verbatim to fascism except for a focus on people instead of nation.
it's the same thing right?
Dont worry nemiroff, its not your fault youre a spacktard.
well thats a good thing that nothing you say actually has any weight to it then. After all you fail to realise that it is the people thay actually make up a nation. most people complain that a leader only cares for themselves and not enougj for the country but youre a special type of stupid.
and that is why I say you lack abstract thinking.
now the question is whether you are young, special, or just trolling.
hmm i wonder who makes up the nation...
putting the nation above the people in the nation.