The debate "Who are the good guys in syria" was started by
April 9, 2017, 9:46 am.
6 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 0 person is on the disagree side.
There needs to be more votes to see what the common perception is.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
thereal posted 10 arguments, wmd posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
thereal, wmd, human and 3 visitors agree.
so far only Syria and Russia reported that, and they provided about as much proof as you did. 0.
I'll reply or ignore you at my discretion, although I can see why you'd want me to remain silent. you said some things that were simply too stupid to leave alone, but not dumb enough to completely ignore. provide a source with proof of this "fact" or shut up.
lmao nemiroff, youre a f***ing retard! you said that you would ignore me after which you responded to me with 3 other posts. Can you stick to anything that you say you will do, you pathetic libtard? Also the rebels storing chemical weapons is a FACT, even the libtard news channels (which you still probably dont watch because youre a retard and dont care about world affairs outside of your own little bubble) reported on it. it is literally common knowledge, you f***tard. im not going to provide a source because you could easily find it yourself with one google search but apparently, looking for facts arent your thing. what can i say, youre a liberal!
claiming the chemicals were stored by rebels and not dropped by Assad is not figures or statistics. and it's your responsibility to back up the claims you make.
anyway, I wasn't expecting anything and you delivered just that. the word "responsibility" may be a decade ahead of your development anyway. good day.
nemiroff, youre stupid. if you wanted to find the figures and statistics, you could easily do so with one google search. this isnt the f***ing pre-internet era that i should need to tell you which book to read and which oages to open, you f***. use your brain and find it yourself you ignorant f***.
yes lmao i was "banned"
yeah but he wasn't directly banned for insults. it's was for the goat thing
wasn't his first statement after returning an insult to the admin?
people change, but only if they want to, and not all the time. and not always for the better.
didn't u get banned for statements like this?
it would really help your side if you provided actual links to your rants. maybe then they would be taken seriously.
Nemiroff, i know you are a goatf***er but you dont HAVE to be a stupid goatf***er. If you ever actually watched the news instead of f***ing goats in your yard, you would know that that was not Syria's "defence for their own actions" because Syria rejected the claim that they ever dropped chemical weapons in the first place. Not only that, but no evidence has even been found to imply that it was Assad that dropped the chemical weapons and the UN office for disarmament affairs even said that there has been no evidence to suggest the chemical weapons were dropped by aircraft. This is why Russia said you should find the evidence first of how the chemical attack occurred instead of attacking somebody 2 days in. 1 week has passed and still no evidence has been found to suggest that it was Assad. Chemical weapons have a unique formula so all it takes is for one ground team to collect a sample and then analyse it, its not difficult. The fact that you are ignorant to these facts and human rationality shows youve been fornicating with one too many goats, nemiroff. Anybody with 2 cells to rub together even knows that the only reason trump ordered the attack was because he wanted the media to get off his back for his alleged connections to Russia and he knew conducting this attack (which putin was logically against) would do just that. goatf***er.
Also, what the f*** do you even know about the Turkish referendum, you ******? All the Turkish referendum does is basically make the Turkish system the same as the US system. It abolishes the office of PM and makes the president in control of the day to day runnings, the same as it is in the USA and it increases parliamentary seats from 550 to 600. On top of that, both the ruling party AND the opposition party support it and now theyre asking the people what they think about it. Stop regurgitating propaganda, you feminine goatf***er.
In terms of Assad, a poll has found that 70% of Syrians want Assad to remain in power, so yes, he is popular. This poll was carried out not by Syria, not by Russia but by a French newspaper. If you actually did research, you would find out these things instead of stating facts as though they are rhetorical statements, you silly goatf***er.
see that? i actually counter your claims instead of just ignoring them you shit. but then again, youre wrong all the time so there is little you can do.
"nemiroff, rebels? are you talking about the rebels that store chemical weapons in civilian areas?"
considering you are just listening to Syria in their defense of their own actions and accepting it without evidence it is clear you failed to realize people actually examined that claim, and if true, there would be a single, highly contaminated area surrounding a building capable of such storage. and considering assads air superiority (only local party actually capable of anything in the air) he would have long presented such evidence. no such evidence exists.
so seeing as you have already proven yourself as a supporter of dictatorships, and willing to believe them in long stretches of logic, then your position is not a surprise. that's why I've been mostly ignoring you, and will continue to do so after this post.
also his "referrendum" has consisted of jailing, banning, and shutting down anyone gathering or broadcasting any opinion against this "referrendum" makes it about as democratic as assads 97% election victories. the context of the referrendum (giving erduan increased power and making their Congress his figurehead) yes, it is autocratic, even if it was elected legitimately democratically (which it isnt) it would still be a referrendum for autocracy.
but of course, assad is clearly an extremely popular barrel bombing life long presideby beloved by 97% of his nation which is currently split into a massive war against him.
In reality what do people actually know about Assads "actions"?
Yes, Nemiroff, you are right. They are cozying up to Russia (who is currently the number 1 upholder of international law, ironically) and going completely autocratic by holding a referendum. How evil of them indeed. How DARE they become friends with a neighbouring nation, which also happens to be against the barbaric, evidence-less, thieving tactics of the US.
and i quote, "We're going to take out 7 countries in 5 years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and finishing off, Iran"
?Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda?? He said, ?No, no.? He says, ?There?s nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq.? He said, ?I guess it?s like we don?t know what to do about terrorists, but we?ve got a good military and we can take down governments.? And he said, ?I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail.?
Youre actually a bunch of spacktards that never learn from their mistakes, no wonder everyone calls Americans stupid.
I want aware turkey was in the equation, and besides being a launching point for us planes, Turkey has been more than useless in Syria while the kurds were the main force pushing back isis.
kurds should get their land and turkey should actually put some fire power up, or shut up. they are already cozying up to Russia and going autocrat, so kissing up to them might be a waste of time now anyway.
They can't be allies all the time. The problem with that is Turkey'll never allow/support a new Kurdish nation in that region. Because Turkey itself has a serious problem with the Kurds in Turkey.
I like 1 & 2. they don't seem to be in conflict, especially if, as you stated, #1 allied with #2.
I don't think the free Syrian army would ever ally with assad.
1) Free Syrian Army: Fighting against ISIS/Kurds/ASAD, make truce with Kurds & ASAD sometimes. Turkey is supporting them. And western nations support Turkey. They tried to overthrow ASAD, but no luck with that.
2) Kurds: Fighting against ISIS/FSA. Western nations are behind them, but sometimes they're good with Russia too. They might be the only secular group in the region. Their goal is to build a Kurdish nation.
3) ASAD, current Syrian government: Fighting against all, but sometimes make truce with Kurds & FSA. Russia backs ASAD up all the time. A total dictatorship.
4) ISIS: Fighting against all. I don't know how they keep fighting without any open support from any country. Worst group anyway.
some of you guys are just too clever (sarcasm)
also i asked for a specific group.
nemiroff, rebels? are you talking about the rebels that store chemical weapons in civilian areas?
The US is not an internal faction, blueray. i thought that was pretty obvious but apparently not. Regardless, even thinking that the US is the good guys shows how stupid you are.
any rebels fighting for economic and political rights without a repressive agenda, religious or secular.