The debate "Why are fascists always the best at speeches" was started by
November 13, 2016, 8:10 am.
8 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 17 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
thereal posted 11 arguments to the agreers part.
neveralone posted 6 arguments to the disagreers part.
thereal, matt_herricane, wmd, monikofos and 4 visitors agree.
Jesmin, neveralone, shomar09, dalton7532, mike1253890, Radhikadhawan, Yanksxx21 and 10 visitors disagree.
I don't care who it asks about. I care about the facts
Hitler knew that the Germans needed somone to blame this is history 101. he listened and decided to say it was the Jews fault. if anyone doesn't know what there saying it's u
you clearly have no idea what youre talking about at this stage.
well they obviously dont.
the best speakers also got to be able to listen to know what the people want
neveralone, yes i f***ing knownit means that they were the best speakers- but you dont. you are talking about their ability to listen to others rather than their ability to speak. everyone who disliked this debate simply did so because it asks about fascists and they cant speak on anything outside of their subject processes of thought
The German identity was ein volk ein reich ein fuhrer.
I do. Fascist leaders speak for the majority. There is nothing but support that they can receive drom their listeners. Banging on a desk and yelling sieg heil does nothing unless it captures the spirit and excitement of the crowds. Hence everybody listening to their speeches would be in full support of the method.
it says fascist are the best at speeches. what exactly did u mean by that if not that they were the best speakers? I'm confused
rogueamerican, i dont think you understand what the current discussion is.
neveralone, the best speakers werent thise lmao. thats actually completely unrelated as it is referring to the listening ability, not speaking ability of a leader. the best speaker is the ome who can capture the crowd in such a way that they believe they dont know what theyre talking about and only the speaker can lead them.
And fascists rise to a majority, destroy the minority, and create a universal nationalist policy. What they say is nearly definitionally with the people.
I put disagree because the best speakers were the ones who saw that people wanted change and promised that.
7 retards disagreed and couldnt argue shit. pathetic fags.
I just noticed I put dictator instead of communist. I actually agree with u sorry for the stupidity.
what do you mean "it was directly said in class"? as in school? if thats the case then your teacher dont know shit. hitler was a fascist dictator, mussolini was a fascist dictator. stalin was a communist dictator but he was nowhere near as good at speeches as the fascists.
fascists domt hate dictators you fool. mussolini was a fascist and a fictator. they can coexist and are actually the most common type of dictator. a dictator is someone who totalitarially rules a country. fascist would be their political view.
it was directly said in class.
sounded like it to me but idk
and how did you come to the conclusions? not where did you learn it, but what was it that you learned that made you think that?
fascists love a strong centralized government and put the good of the nation above that of individual citizens. they would love a strong dictator in my opinion.
well that mainly came from my gov. class and we extensively researched Hitler
why do you say fascists hate dictators? can you explain based on their ideology?
fascist arnt dictators. they actually hate dictators. Hitler said he was fascist until he got power then he became a dictator
obviously the attrocities they committed are a seperate matter, here we are just discussing their ability to capture a crowd.
mussolini and hitler were 2 of the best speech givers in history. frankly if they showed their speeches in schools, a lot of people would find it hard to not like them purely because of the way in which they carry themselves.
well thats a fallacy because most of the time the large majority of people support the dictator.
because they should keep people in their hand. otherwise they would revolt