Women don't need to dress with short clothes to be sexy

March 28, 2014, 3:20 pm

Agree5 Disagree0

100%
0%

The debate "Women don't need to dress with short clothes to be sexy" was started by The_writer on March 28, 2014, 3:20 pm. 5 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 0 person is on the disagree side. There needs to be more votes to see what the common perception is. It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.

echofrommadiun posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
posted the first argument on this debate as an agreeing part.

The_writer, echofrommadiun, rachel, MerciPol and 1 visitor agree.
Nobody disagrees.

Looking beautiful or sexy cannot be judged only by the short clothes a woman is wearing. A beautiful woman may look sexy although she is wearing long trousers because she has what we call “natural beauty”. A short and plain woman, wearing short clothes, is not a guarantee that she is going to look sexy. Perhaps, she is going to look strange. So, wearing short clothes is not a guarantee that a woman is going to look sexy.

5 years, 8 months ago
Discuss "Women don't need to dress with short clothes to be sexy" fashion society
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.