You can be Christian and still believe in evolution and the Big Bang

May 31, 2016, 11:23 am

Agree22 Disagree8

73%
27%

The debate "You can be Christian and still believe in evolution and the Big Bang" was started by sabrina on May 31, 2016, 11:23 am. 22 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 8 people are on the disagree side. It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.

Nemiroff posted 5 arguments, TZW posted 2 arguments, hasantahsin posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
psychorejection posted 3 arguments to the disagreers part.

sabrina, MrShine, TZW, Austin7779, SwaggerPoptart, ototoxic, hasantahsin, Nemiroff, xXimmapersonXDXx, JLabang123, nellie11iah and 11 visitors agree.
psychorejection, redeemed and 6 visitors disagree.

Nemiroff
replied to...

no single change separates us from other apes. the accumulation of many many changes eventually make it that procreation fails to work. there is also an in between stage where procreation works but the result is sterile. (mules, ligers)

why would these almost procreation exist in non/sudden evolution models?

3 years, 1 month ago
RogueAmerican
replied to...

So apes are just as much man as we are in that case. If it were to be such a blur, we could continually procreate with your common zoo animals. At some point, a distinction comes along.

3 years, 1 month ago

there is no point where we evolved into ourselves. evolution is gradual, not a sudden upgrade. What separates us from our ancestors is not a sudden division, but several blurry millenia of small changes. in fact, the entire history of life is one big blurry mess of constant evolution, we only categorize it into specific steps for our convenience (limitations)

3 years, 1 month ago
RogueAmerican
replied to...

I will explain. I don't reject evolution. I'm saying that at some point we evolved into ourselves and that point is Adam and Eve. That is what I'm saying is irrefutable.

3 years, 1 month ago
Nemiroff
replied to...

if we are not in contention about the evolution of our species, then what was the issue about who fathered humanity?

3 years, 1 month ago
RogueAmerican
replied to...

I dont believe we are in contention.

3 years, 1 month ago
Nemiroff
replied to...

we evolved. we are the culmination of eons of a relentless arms race. the undisputed, it's no longer even fair, champion apex predator. currently seeking the title of game masters of a tiny little world, within a seemingly endless universe of possibilities.

3 years, 1 month ago

You should combine the two, it creates an ignorant society when you can't/won't. Some people only believe in science and some only believe in relgion. A more tolerant world is a more peaceful world.

3 years, 1 month ago

WE SHOULD NEVER MIX RELIGION WITH SCIENCE. BCZ BOTH DOESNT GO TOGETHER. SCIENCE BELIEVES IN TRUTH. AND RELIGION BELIVES IN MIRACLES AND OTHER STUFFS

3 years, 1 month ago
RogueAmerican
replied to...

So there can be absolutely no union. Science, by its very nature can't explain God?

3 years, 1 month ago

I have a question for you all then: if Adam and Eve didn't exist, who fathered humanity. It had to have started at some point,

3 years, 1 month ago

Adam and Eve are symbolic of the birth of Judaism.

3 years, 1 month ago
Nemiroff
replied to...

and I didn't say it concides with scientific findings. I said it doesn't contradict them.

very big difference.

3 years, 1 month ago

there is absolutely no evidence Adam and Eve existed. it is pretty much impossible that story is true.

3 years, 1 month ago
Nemiroff
replied to...

and you can link us to the evidence for Adam and eve?

3 years, 1 month ago
RogueAmerican
replied to...

That is a false argument. Adam and Eve did exist which is scientifically true

3 years, 1 month ago
RogueAmerican
replied to...

He didn't address that issue. He only stated that the belief that God created our conception of physics, etc. coincides with science.

3 years, 1 month ago
psychorejection
replied to...

Also if the bible isn't taken literally at some junctions it complete topples the religion. if Adam and eve aren't literally than there would be no cause for sin and thus no cause for Jesus.

3 years, 1 month ago
psychorejection
replied to...

That idea is just a ridiculous to a scientist as the idea a magical unicorn crapped the universe into existence. It's like me saying that it's unscientific for a god to be causing the rain but it is scientific if a god created the water cycle. give me a break

3 years, 1 month ago

Sure you can be a Christian and beliebe the Big Bang but only if you commit so much sophistry and twist your religious texts so much that really you could posit anything and claim the bible supports or condemns it

3 years, 1 month ago

Interestingly enough, a Catholic priest was one of the drivers of the big bang theory.

3 years, 1 month ago

a literal reading of the Bible is not compatible with the findings of science. the idea that the earth was formed prior to other celestial bodies is currently a silly position to hold.

the idea of the Christian God setting up the laws of the universe and doing his work through the big bang and the process of evolution is compatible with the findings of science.

3 years, 1 month ago
Discuss "You can be Christian and still believe in evolution and the Big Bang" education life philosophy
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.