The debate "You don't know what you don't know that is why google can not be our primary source of knowledge" was started by
October 8, 2015, 9:14 pm.
11 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 14 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
Hitmenjr posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
PsychDave posted 1 argument, pajrc1234 posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
Hitmenjr, ailasorecarg, otakunime00, Ryan, Skeetc15, AstroSpace, dominanter, WaspToxin and 3 visitors agree.
sloanstar1000, PsychDave, confident, deca808, pajrc1234, AmericanScholar and 8 visitors disagree.
there are ways to find good sources of information, like databases.
Im not saying its not a good surch tool...Its just not a good way too learn on your own.
While it is true that you don't know what you don't know, what do you suggest as an alternative? If I argued that the antidisestablishmentarianist movement was correct, where would you suggest people go to understand what I was arguing?