The debate "You shouldn't judge people because of their tattoos and piercings" was started by
July 16, 2014, 12:03 pm.
44 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 4 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
Michelle_M posted 2 arguments, echofrommadiun posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
tkershaw3 posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
alexgrabham95, PeanutButterEllie, wmd, Michelle_M, dana1099, Medina, Miabbby, AllieAlexandriaSchrader, MerciPol, AlexLovesBenihime, echofrommadiun and 33 visitors agree.
tkershaw3 and 3 visitors disagree.
Tattoos and piercings are just an accessory but some people make tattoos to show their identity, let say musicians. Musicians assume that tattoos and piercings are the part of art itself but it depends on the country you live in. Tattoo was invented when European explored America in the 18th century and tattoos are so popular among youngsters in Europe until now. Not all people who have tattoos and piercings in their body indicate that they are bad people. It’s true that we shouldn’t judge people because of their tattoos or piercings.
I notice tattoos and piercings but I judge people's attitudes far more than their appearance, although I do judge if I see someone who makes no effort to appear neat and clean regardless of their body art. Showering is essential!
A nice ideal perhaps. But we all judge--and are judged--on appearances.
People should be considered equal and judged based on their actions. Tattoos and piercings do not make one a bad person, just like a clean cut person can appear good but be hiding. Judging a book by its cover is narrow minded and often leads to incorrect assumptions.