Your preference doesn't define the quality of art. You can like what is bad and dislike what is good

March 26, 2015, 12:12 pm

Agree40 Disagree2

95%
5%

The debate "Your preference doesn't define the quality of art. You can like what is bad and dislike what is good" was started by I_Voyager on March 26, 2015, 12:12 pm. 40 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 2 people are on the disagree side. That might be enough to see the common perception. It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.

Nobody posted any argument under Your preference doesn't define the quality of art. You can like what is bad and dislike what is good yet. Be the first one to post an argument.

I_Voyager, PsychDave, Bodaciouslady16, ghettoturtle217, Fromage, invincible_01, stormshy, Kaitlyn56, Fountaine550, Untamed, transfanboy, jesusorgy, soullesschicken, Turtle, thisrisingtide, Trance, xbulletwithbutterflywingsx, ailasorecarg, scotthansonMC, SalonY and 20 visitors agree.
2 visitors disagree.

Discuss "Your preference doesn't define the quality of art. You can like what is bad and dislike what is good" music arts philosophy
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.